Comments on: Mr. President, They Don’t Hate Us Any More!!

By: elmysterio

elmysterio — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:20:25 +0000

It really bothers me that a low-intellegence hateful person like Malkin gets so much media attention. She is a horrible person. She’s a professional liar and a murderer of truth.

By: john

john — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:24:21 +0000

This pettiness is part and parcel of the creeping fascism that is pervading society today. Perhaps I should not use the word pettiness, as in reality the issue is part of the wider “neo-con” USrael agenda to demonise the Arabs.What sick societies we “civilised” countries are.

By: Troubled Texan

Troubled Texan — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:41:03 +0000

I’m sorry,

If Michelle supports it, it’s only for her advancement.

Not worth the effort.

Troubled

By: Z T Minhas

Z T Minhas — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:52:57 +0000

I am so glad that Bitch-kin is not representative of the Filipinos that I know, but then again I am not in the United States. Most of the Filipinos that I know are either from the south in Mindanao or know of many who are.

By: The Big Raven

The Big Raven — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:41:16 +0000

What makes us First Nation peoples really laugh is clowns like this woman wants to be a white americans with all the ignorant trimmings and whats sad is people can not stay in thier OWN homelands and deal with the huge problems there……nooooooooooo they have to come here and pretend that some white god and his son gave you my peoples land and the rest is history. Like me and my Iraqi friends say WHY DONT YOU JUUST GO HOME!
PEACE!

By: Leroy Glinchy

Leroy Glinchy — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:33:55 +0000

Good article.

The freedoms that Bush spoke of were freedom to consume not freedom of press. I don’t think he ever signed a law that strengthened freedom of press. If you looked at the RNC 2000, they did everything to stop freedom of speach not to promote it.

Second what should DD have done? Easy.

1. Publicly denounce terrorism and explain that they do not support it in anyway. Also, explain that their ad did not portray any support of terrorism in anyway. Continue the ad as the criticism is incorrect.

2. Sue anyone who said that they support terrorism for slander. Calculate how much revenue they would have made had these incorrect claims been made and sue for damanges. Add on legal fees and punative damages.

Pulling the ad kind of says to the public, “we supported terrorism before, but only through the vigilance of the press did these wrongs be righted.” I don’t think anyone in DD believes this. I love DD, and support them in any way. Their coffee is affordable especially their powder coffee and their dounuts are tasty.

By: girlikecupcake

girlikecupcake — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:54:05 +0000

Well written. I think it was bull that DD pulled the ad. Since when is a SCARF, an article of clothing, a terrorist symbol? Since when are headdresses at all a terrorist symbol?

By: Revolutionary fellow

Revolutionary fellow — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:23:00 +0000

The leader of the Islamic Revolution of Iran wears one of these too; Iranian soldiers in Iraq-Iran war wore them, all for Palestine. The enemies of Islam have good reason not to like their people wear a similar thing. Seems to be natural reaction, just as we don’t like people who wear ties; even in Press TV no one wears ties! I mean how a revolutionary anti imperialist can wear a tie!? So incompatible that would be.

By: robertsgt40

robertsgt40 — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:56:26 +0000

The real kicker is Malkin is married to a Jewish guy. What a hoot

By: shukor

shukor — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:20:20 +0000

Poor Mz Mulkin, Philipino she is not. American she is not. Only ass kissers for the Neo- Cons. They truely are the cons.
They are the true reflections of what hate is really all about.